What is the Shareholder Proposal Rule? & Why Might It Matter to Delaware?
Panel Discussion
held December 11, 2025
About the Event
Exploring the Shareholder Proposal Rule & Delaware’s Corporate Franchise
Watch the Video
On November 17, 2025, the SEC announced further changes in related practices. For decades, the SEC staff served as the main referee, issuing views on when companies could omit a shareholder proposal. That system placed most of the interpretive weight on federal law, with state corporate law playing only a modest role. For the upcoming proxy season, however, the staff will weigh in only on questions that turn on state law—specifically, whether a proposal is a proper subject for shareholder action. On all other disputes, companies and shareholders will proceed without SEC staff views.
The shareholder proposal rule, a longstanding feature of the federal proxy system, has rarely intersected with state corporation law, leaving many Delaware practitioners unfamiliar with its operation or implications. Yet this new focus on the intersection between federal rule and state law implicates Delaware’s corporate franchise, an important topic that the State of Delaware has recently asked the University of Delaware’s Institute for Public Administration (IPA) to study. It is therefore timely to consider both the shareholder proposal rule and its significance in the context of Delaware’s corporate franchise.
To promote informed discussion over coming months, the Weinberg Center, in partnership with IPA, will convene a program that frames the context in terms of Delaware’s corporate franchise and then explores the shareholder proposal rule itself.
Welcome and Introduction
Lawrence A. Cunningham, Presiding Director, Weinberg Center, University of Delaware
Troy D. Mix, Acting Director, Institute for Public Administration, University of Delaware
Special Guest
The Honorable Charuni Patibanda-Sanchez, Delaware Secretary of State
Panelists
Yafit Cohn, Chief Sustainability Officer and Group General Counsel, The Travelers Companies Inc., Member of the Policy Advisory Committee of the Society for Corporate Governance
Jill E. Fisch, Saul A. Fox Distinguished Professor, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Bob McCormick, CEO, Council of Institutional Investors
Ronald O. Mueller, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Kyle A. Pinder, Partner, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Robert E. Wright, Lecturer in Economic History, Central Michigan University
Recommended Reading
Approved for 1.5 CLE credits
Paul S. Atkins
Keynote Address at the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance’s 25th Anniversary Gala (October 9, 2025)
Ronald O. Mueller, et al., “Atkins on Challenges to Non-Binding Shareholder Proposals & DE/TX Law,” Harvard Governance, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance (October 16, 2025)
Kyle Pinder
“The Non-Binding Bind: Reframing Precatory Stockholder Proposals under Delaware Law”
(forthcoming 2025 Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review) (September 2, 2025)
Robert E. Wright
“Delaware’s Charter Leadership and the Political Use of Shareholder Proposals,” Weinberg Center Occasional Paper Series, No. 2501 (November 2025) [PDF]
Corporate Collaborative @ UD
Report: Trends in Corporate Franchise Revenue (University of Delaware Institute for Public Administration in partnership with WCCG and others) (working title, forthcoming November 2025)
Jill Fisch, Shareholder Proposals: Law and Policy Considerations, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance (Dec. 9, 2025)
Lawrence A. Cunningham
SEC Restraint on Shareholder Proposals to Stoke State Competition, Bloomberg (November 11, 2025)
Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule 14a-8 (text)